[{"_1":2,"_81":-5,"_82":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4},"routes/category.$slug",{"_5":6,"_64":74,"_76":77,"_78":77,"_79":80},"posts",[7],{"_8":9,"_10":11,"_12":13,"_14":-5,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":22,"_23":16,"_24":25,"_26":27,"_28":29,"_30":31,"_32":33,"_34":35,"_36":37,"_38":39,"_40":41,"_42":43,"_44":45,"_46":47,"_64":65},"id",3,"slug","what-is-the-vagus-nerve","locale","en","translationOfId","title","What Is the Vagus Nerve? Your Body's Calm Switch, Explained","excerpt","The vagus nerve is the main wiring of your parasympathetic nervous system. How it actually works, what slow breathing measurably does to it, and which popular claims the research does and doesn't support.","content","

The vagus nerve is the tenth cranial nerve (CN X) and the main wiring of your parasympathetic nervous system. It runs from your brainstem to your gut, passing through your heart, lungs, and diaphragm, and roughly 80 percent of its fibers are afferent (sensory wires carrying signals from body to brain, not the other way around). That asymmetry is the anatomical reason a slow breath can change how you feel within about a minute. Russo et al., 2017 (Breathe, the European Respiratory Society's journal) walks through the full pathway. This post is the same picture without the journal subscription.

\n\n

\"A — The vagus nerve is mostly a sensing nerve. Slow breathing gives it more body signals to send to the brain.

\n\n

How breathing actually reaches the vagus nerve

\n\n

Three structures matter. Pulmonary stretch receptors in the smooth muscle of your airways. Arterial baroreceptors in your aorta and carotid arteries. The nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), a small region in your brainstem.

\n\n

Stretch receptors fire as your lungs inflate. Their signals travel up the vagus nerve to the NTS, where they modulate respiratory rhythm and cardiac rate. (This is the Hering-Breuer reflex. Widdicombe, 2006, in the Journal of Applied Physiology, gives the historical and modern picture.) Baroreceptors detect blood-pressure swings. Their signals travel via the vagus (aortic) and the glossopharyngeal nerve (carotid) to the same brainstem region. La Rovere et al., 2008, in the Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, lays out the clinical measurement of baroreflex sensitivity in plain enough language for a non-cardiologist.

\n\n

The NTS integrates everything and projects to the nucleus ambiguus, the cluster of neurons that fires the rapid cardiac vagal motor signal. That signal is what slows your heart on the next exhale. So the chain reads: stretch the lungs slowly, gently swing the blood pressure, send a steady stream of \"all clear\" signals up to the brainstem, and the brainstem signals the heart to slow. Body senses calm breathing. Brain tells the heart to slow.

\n\n

Picture the moment after a hard call. Your jaw is clenched and your chest feels high. You sit, you exhale longer than you inhale, and within about 60 seconds something gives. That isn't the breath relaxing you in the abstract. It's the receptors above firing, the NTS receiving, and the cardiac vagal motor neurons firing back. The mechanism is mechanical, not metaphorical.

\n\n

What the research shows

\n\n

The strongest single number comes from Laborde et al., 2022, a systematic review and meta-analysis in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. The team pooled roughly 58 studies of voluntary slow breathing in healthy adults. Compared with spontaneous breathing, slow breathing raised vagally-indexed HRV metrics (RMSSD and high-frequency power) with small to medium effect sizes. The signal is real. It is not enormous.

\n\n

Three caveats live with that finding. The included studies were heterogeneous (different populations, different session lengths, different exact pacing). Many primary trials had fewer than 30 participants. And most measured single sessions, not long-term practice, so the meta-analysis can speak to acute effects more confidently than to durable training effects.

\n\n

Lehrer and Gevirtz, 2014, in Frontiers in Psychology, lays out the more specific finding. Paced breathing at each individual's resonance frequency (typically 5 to 6.5 breaths per minute, with most adults landing near 6) produces unusually large breath-by-breath HRV oscillations. That happens because the slow respiratory rhythm matches the natural oscillation of the baroreflex, and the two systems synchronize. Over weeks of training, the authors describe baroreflex gain itself improving.

\n\n

That 6-breaths-per-minute number is probably the closest thing breathwork has to a load-bearing finding. It shows up across independent labs, across decades, and it's the physiological reason resonance breathing exists as a category at all.

\n\n

Honest limit on the source: Lehrer and Gevirtz are themselves central researchers in HRV biofeedback, so the review summarizes a research program they helped build, not an outside audit of it. That's a fact about the literature, not an indictment of the work. If you want the underlying mechanism in plain language without the in-house framing, Russo, Santarelli, and O'Rourke's 2017 review in Breathe is the cleanest single source. They walk through baroreflex coupling, vagal afferent signaling, and cardiorespiratory coupling without assuming a physiology background. (And they're refreshingly honest about which parts are well-measured outcome and which are still inference.)

\n\n

The physiology in detail

\n\n

\"A — Stretch receptors in the airways and baroreceptors in the great arteries both feed the same brainstem region. The vagus nerve carries most of those signals up.

\n\n

Afferent dominance

\n\n

Roughly 80 percent of vagal fibers are afferent (Berthoud and Neuhuber, 2000, Autonomic Neuroscience). The vagus is mostly a sensing nerve, not a commanding one. The popular phrase \"stimulate your vagus\" makes more anatomical sense as \"give it more body signals to send up.\" That is exactly what slow diaphragmatic breathing does.

\n\n

Worth noting: the 80 percent figure was originally counted in cat vagi (Agostoni and colleagues, 1957, replicated across species since). Direct human counts are harder to obtain. So treat \"roughly 80 percent\" as honest, not \"exactly 80 percent.\"

\n\n

Baroreflex resonance

\n\n

\"A — When your breath rate matches the baroreflex's natural oscillation near 0.1 Hz, the two systems synchronize and HRV swings get unusually large (Lehrer and Gevirtz, 2014).

\n\n

The baroreflex is your blood-pressure thermostat. It oscillates naturally near 0.1 Hz, which is about 6 cycles per minute. When you breathe at the same rhythm, the respiratory swing in chest pressure synchronizes with the baroreflex swing in blood pressure, and the two systems lock in. Lehrer and Gevirtz call this the \"resonance frequency\" of the cardiovascular system. That is the mechanistic answer to the question \"why 6 breaths per minute, exactly?\" There is nothing mystical about it. The cardiovascular system just happens to have an oscillation period close to 10 seconds, and matching it amplifies the swing.

\n\n

NTS as the integration point

\n\n

The nucleus tractus solitarius in the brainstem is where vagal afferents land. Benarroch's 1993 review in Mayo Clinic Proceedings is the canonical mini-tour of the central autonomic network. The NTS receives the signals, integrates them with input from other autonomic structures, and projects to the nucleus ambiguus, the cardiac vagal motor center that slows your heart in time with each exhale. The whole loop runs in under a second.

\n\n

What's still debated

\n\n

Two things are not contested. The vagus nerve exists, and it is the main parasympathetic motor nerve in your body. Slow breathing reaches it through the receptors and central pathways above. What gets contested is more specific.

\n\n

Polyvagal theory

\n\n

Stephen Porges introduced polyvagal theory in 2007 (Biological Psychology). His framework proposes two evolutionarily distinct vagal motor branches. The older unmyelinated branch drives \"freeze\" responses. The newer myelinated \"social engagement\" branch (originating in the nucleus ambiguus) handles fast cardiac control and interfaces with the face, voice, and breathing. Polyvagal theory has become the default framing in popular trauma and breathwork writing.

\n\n

In 2023, Paul Grossman published a critical commentary in the same journal. Grossman argues that each of polyvagal theory's five core empirical premises is unsupported or contradicted by the comparative-anatomy and cardiorespiratory literature. That includes the foundational claim that respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a specific index of nucleus-ambiguus vagal activity. The honest summary: the vagus and its parasympathetic role are settled science. Specific polyvagal claims about distinct evolutionary branches are contested. Porges and colleagues have responded, and the debate is active. If you read someone treating polyvagal theory as established fact, that is a tell. If you read someone treating it as completely refuted, that is also a tell.

\n\n

HRV as a vagal-tone proxy

\n\n

Heart rate variability is widely treated as a one-number stand-in for \"vagal activity.\" Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017, in Frontiers in Public Health, is the cleanest plain-language overview of HRV metrics. RMSSD and high-frequency power are reasonable vagally-indexed measures in healthy adults at rest. The LF/HF ratio specifically is not a clean sympathetic-versus-vagal index, despite being marketed that way by some consumer apps. Single-day HRV readings also bounce around with sleep, hydration, alcohol, recent training, and acute stress. Trends across weeks are more interpretable than any single morning's number.

\n\n

Replication concerns

\n\n

Kok et al., 2013, in Psychological Science, reported that a loving-kindness meditation intervention raised high-frequency HRV. The study is widely cited in popular vagal-tone writing. But subsequent attempts to scrutinize the statistical analysis have raised questions, and the field has not settled on the result as well-supported. Use it as an example of \"often-cited, but the field has questioned it,\" not as a load-bearing claim. The cleaner cite for \"slow breathing raises HRV in healthy adults\" remains Laborde 2022.

\n\n

What this means for your daily practice

\n\n

Three things follow from the mechanism.

\n\n

Breath rate matters more than the specific pattern. If you're breathing somewhere near 6 per minute, with a relaxed exhale, you're already inside the resonance band. Box breathing at 4-4-4-4 lands at 3.75 breaths per minute (close enough that the baroreflex still amplifies). 4-7-8 lands at about 2.7 breaths per minute, slower than resonance, which makes it stronger for sleep onset and slightly weaker for HRV training. Resonance breathing at exactly 5 to 6.5 per minute is the most direct application of the physiology above.

\n\n

The acute parasympathetic shift is fast but small. Russo et al. put the onset at roughly 60 to 90 seconds for measurable parasympathetic activation, with subjective calming taking 2 to 5 minutes. Don't expect a 30-second session to do much. Two minutes is the working dose, and longer doesn't compound linearly inside a single sitting.

\n\n

Training effects on baseline HRV happen on a multi-week timescale. Lehrer and Gevirtz describe daily practice over 4 to 8 weeks as the typical window before resting HRV measurably improves. If you've been doing two minutes a day for a week and your morning reading hasn't moved, that's exactly what the literature would predict. Patience is the technique.

\n\n

A practical note on what to actually count. Many beginners try to track HRV daily on a wearable and end up disappointed. The single-day reading is noisy. It moves with sleep quality, alcohol, hydration, the room temperature, and how the strap fits. A more useful metric for the first few weeks is something simpler: did you do your two minutes today, yes or no? Over time, the consistency drives the physiology, and the physiology eventually shows up in the numbers. (Trying it the other way around, where the wearable reading drives motivation, is a common reason people quit by week three.) But if you do want a number to track, look at a 7-day rolling RMSSD average, not the single morning reading.

\n\n

One important caveat for the safety side of this picture. Not every breathwork protocol is parasympathetic. Wim Hof breathing deliberately drives sympathetic activation during the hyperventilation phase before the breath-hold. The vagus nerve is involved, but the system is being challenged rather than gently engaged, and the safety profile is different. We cover that in detail in our Wim Hof safety post.

\n\n

How BreathSesh maps onto the mechanism

\n\n

BreathSesh ships four patterns, and each one sits at a different point on the breath-rate axis. Calm Breathing and Box both fall close to the resonance band (around 4 to 6 breaths per minute). 4-7-8 sits below, where the long exhale dominates and the technique skews toward sleep onset rather than HRV training. Wim Hof sits in a separate category entirely (sympathetic challenge, not parasympathetic engagement, and with its own contraindications). All four patterns run offline without an account, which only matters here in the sense that nothing about resonance breathing depends on a server. The physiology is intrinsic. The phone is just the metronome.

\n\n

The bottom line

\n\n

The vagus nerve is well-established anatomy. The parasympathetic role of the vagus is well-established physiology. Slow breathing measurably engages it through the stretch-receptor and baroreceptor pathways above, and the acute effect is real but modest. The specific framings most popular wellness writing leans on (polyvagal-branch claims, HRV-as-clean-vagal-tone-readout, \"tone your vagus in five minutes\") are oversold. The mechanism is more interesting than the marketing version, and it asks less of you in return: a couple of minutes a day, somewhere near 6 breaths per minute, sustained over weeks. That is the calibrated picture the research supports.

","contentPlain","The vagus nerve is the tenth cranial nerve (CN X) and the main wiring of your parasympathetic nervous system. It runs from your brainstem to your gut, passing through your heart, lungs, and diaphragm, and roughly 80 percent of its fibers are afferent (sensory wires carrying signals from body to brain, not the other way around). That asymmetry is the anatomical reason a slow breath can change how you feel within about a minute. Russo et al., 2017 (Breathe, the European Respiratory Society's journal) walks through the full pathway. This post is the same picture without the journal subscription.\n\n[Image: A glowing teal mist flows in and out of a softly silhouetted seated figure against deep darkness, suggesting the breath as a visible signal moving in and out of the body.]\n\n## How breathing actually reaches the vagus nerve\n\nThree structures matter. Pulmonary stretch receptors in the smooth muscle of your airways. Arterial baroreceptors in your aorta and carotid arteries. The nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), a small region in your brainstem.\n\nStretch receptors fire as your lungs inflate. Their signals travel up the vagus nerve to the NTS, where they modulate respiratory rhythm and cardiac rate. (This is the Hering-Breuer reflex. Widdicombe, 2006, in the Journal of Applied Physiology, gives the historical and modern picture.) Baroreceptors detect blood-pressure swings. Their signals travel via the vagus (aortic) and the glossopharyngeal nerve (carotid) to the same brainstem region. La Rovere et al., 2008, in the Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, lays out the clinical measurement of baroreflex sensitivity in plain enough language for a non-cardiologist.\n\nThe NTS integrates everything and projects to the nucleus ambiguus, the cluster of neurons that fires the rapid cardiac vagal motor signal. That signal is what slows your heart on the next exhale. So the chain reads: stretch the lungs slowly, gently swing the blood pressure, send a steady stream of \"all clear\" signals up to the brainstem, and the brainstem signals the heart to slow. Body senses calm breathing. Brain tells the heart to slow.\n\nPicture the moment after a hard call. Your jaw is clenched and your chest feels high. You sit, you exhale longer than you inhale, and within about 60 seconds something gives. That isn't the breath relaxing you in the abstract. It's the receptors above firing, the NTS receiving, and the cardiac vagal motor neurons firing back. The mechanism is mechanical, not metaphorical.\n\n## What the research shows\n\nThe strongest single number comes from Laborde et al., 2022, a systematic review and meta-analysis in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. The team pooled roughly 58 studies of voluntary slow breathing in healthy adults. Compared with spontaneous breathing, slow breathing raised vagally-indexed HRV metrics (RMSSD and high-frequency power) with small to medium effect sizes. The signal is real. It is not enormous.\n\nThree caveats live with that finding. The included studies were heterogeneous (different populations, different session lengths, different exact pacing). Many primary trials had fewer than 30 participants. And most measured single sessions, not long-term practice, so the meta-analysis can speak to acute effects more confidently than to durable training effects.\n\nLehrer and Gevirtz, 2014, in Frontiers in Psychology, lays out the more specific finding. Paced breathing at each individual's resonance frequency (typically 5 to 6.5 breaths per minute, with most adults landing near 6) produces unusually large breath-by-breath HRV oscillations. That happens because the slow respiratory rhythm matches the natural oscillation of the baroreflex, and the two systems synchronize. Over weeks of training, the authors describe baroreflex gain itself improving.\n\nThat 6-breaths-per-minute number is probably the closest thing breathwork has to a load-bearing finding. It shows up across independent labs, across decades, and it's the physiological reason resonance breathing exists as a category at all.\n\nHonest limit on the source: Lehrer and Gevirtz are themselves central researchers in HRV biofeedback, so the review summarizes a research program they helped build, not an outside audit of it. That's a fact about the literature, not an indictment of the work. If you want the underlying mechanism in plain language without the in-house framing, Russo, Santarelli, and O'Rourke's 2017 review in Breathe is the cleanest single source. They walk through baroreflex coupling, vagal afferent signaling, and cardiorespiratory coupling without assuming a physiology background. (And they're refreshingly honest about which parts are well-measured outcome and which are still inference.)\n\n## The physiology in detail\n\n[Image: A pair of lung shapes formed entirely from densely arranged green ferns and tree branches against a pale background, an editorial composition evoking the link between breath and the autonomic nervous system.]\n\n### Afferent dominance\n\nRoughly 80 percent of vagal fibers are afferent (Berthoud and Neuhuber, 2000, Autonomic Neuroscience). The vagus is mostly a sensing nerve, not a commanding one. The popular phrase \"stimulate your vagus\" makes more anatomical sense as \"give it more body signals to send up.\" That is exactly what slow diaphragmatic breathing does.\n\nWorth noting: the 80 percent figure was originally counted in cat vagi (Agostoni and colleagues, 1957, replicated across species since). Direct human counts are harder to obtain. So treat \"roughly 80 percent\" as honest, not \"exactly 80 percent.\"\n\n### Baroreflex resonance\n\n[Image: A thin pool of water on a speaker's surface vibrates into perfect concentric ring patterns, lit from below in teal, suggesting how matched frequencies amplify each other.]\n\nThe baroreflex is your blood-pressure thermostat. It oscillates naturally near 0.1 Hz, which is about 6 cycles per minute. When you breathe at the same rhythm, the respiratory swing in chest pressure synchronizes with the baroreflex swing in blood pressure, and the two systems lock in. Lehrer and Gevirtz call this the \"resonance frequency\" of the cardiovascular system. That is the mechanistic answer to the question \"why 6 breaths per minute, exactly?\" There is nothing mystical about it. The cardiovascular system just happens to have an oscillation period close to 10 seconds, and matching it amplifies the swing.\n\n### NTS as the integration point\n\nThe nucleus tractus solitarius in the brainstem is where vagal afferents land. Benarroch's 1993 review in Mayo Clinic Proceedings is the canonical mini-tour of the central autonomic network. The NTS receives the signals, integrates them with input from other autonomic structures, and projects to the nucleus ambiguus, the cardiac vagal motor center that slows your heart in time with each exhale. The whole loop runs in under a second.\n\n## What's still debated\n\nTwo things are not contested. The vagus nerve exists, and it is the main parasympathetic motor nerve in your body. Slow breathing reaches it through the receptors and central pathways above. What gets contested is more specific.\n\n### Polyvagal theory\n\nStephen Porges introduced polyvagal theory in 2007 (Biological Psychology). His framework proposes two evolutionarily distinct vagal motor branches. The older unmyelinated branch drives \"freeze\" responses. The newer myelinated \"social engagement\" branch (originating in the nucleus ambiguus) handles fast cardiac control and interfaces with the face, voice, and breathing. Polyvagal theory has become the default framing in popular trauma and breathwork writing.\n\nIn 2023, Paul Grossman published a critical commentary in the same journal. Grossman argues that each of polyvagal theory's five core empirical premises is unsupported or contradicted by the comparative-anatomy and cardiorespiratory literature. That includes the foundational claim that respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a specific index of nucleus-ambiguus vagal activity. The honest summary: the vagus and its parasympathetic role are settled science. Specific polyvagal claims about distinct evolutionary branches are contested. Porges and colleagues have responded, and the debate is active. If you read someone treating polyvagal theory as established fact, that is a tell. If you read someone treating it as completely refuted, that is also a tell.\n\n### HRV as a vagal-tone proxy\n\nHeart rate variability is widely treated as a one-number stand-in for \"vagal activity.\" Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017, in Frontiers in Public Health, is the cleanest plain-language overview of HRV metrics. RMSSD and high-frequency power are reasonable vagally-indexed measures in healthy adults at rest. The LF/HF ratio specifically is not a clean sympathetic-versus-vagal index, despite being marketed that way by some consumer apps. Single-day HRV readings also bounce around with sleep, hydration, alcohol, recent training, and acute stress. Trends across weeks are more interpretable than any single morning's number.\n\n### Replication concerns\n\nKok et al., 2013, in Psychological Science, reported that a loving-kindness meditation intervention raised high-frequency HRV. The study is widely cited in popular vagal-tone writing. But subsequent attempts to scrutinize the statistical analysis have raised questions, and the field has not settled on the result as well-supported. Use it as an example of \"often-cited, but the field has questioned it,\" not as a load-bearing claim. The cleaner cite for \"slow breathing raises HRV in healthy adults\" remains Laborde 2022.\n\n## What this means for your daily practice\n\nThree things follow from the mechanism.\n\nBreath rate matters more than the specific pattern. If you're breathing somewhere near 6 per minute, with a relaxed exhale, you're already inside the resonance band. Box breathing at 4-4-4-4 lands at 3.75 breaths per minute (close enough that the baroreflex still amplifies). 4-7-8 lands at about 2.7 breaths per minute, slower than resonance, which makes it stronger for sleep onset and slightly weaker for HRV training. Resonance breathing at exactly 5 to 6.5 per minute is the most direct application of the physiology above.\n\nThe acute parasympathetic shift is fast but small. Russo et al. put the onset at roughly 60 to 90 seconds for measurable parasympathetic activation, with subjective calming taking 2 to 5 minutes. Don't expect a 30-second session to do much. Two minutes is the working dose, and longer doesn't compound linearly inside a single sitting.\n\nTraining effects on baseline HRV happen on a multi-week timescale. Lehrer and Gevirtz describe daily practice over 4 to 8 weeks as the typical window before resting HRV measurably improves. If you've been doing two minutes a day for a week and your morning reading hasn't moved, that's exactly what the literature would predict. Patience is the technique.\n\nA practical note on what to actually count. Many beginners try to track HRV daily on a wearable and end up disappointed. The single-day reading is noisy. It moves with sleep quality, alcohol, hydration, the room temperature, and how the strap fits. A more useful metric for the first few weeks is something simpler: did you do your two minutes today, yes or no? Over time, the consistency drives the physiology, and the physiology eventually shows up in the numbers. (Trying it the other way around, where the wearable reading drives motivation, is a common reason people quit by week three.) But if you do want a number to track, look at a 7-day rolling RMSSD average, not the single morning reading.\n\nOne important caveat for the safety side of this picture. Not every breathwork protocol is parasympathetic. Wim Hof breathing deliberately drives sympathetic activation during the hyperventilation phase before the breath-hold. The vagus nerve is involved, but the system is being challenged rather than gently engaged, and the safety profile is different. We cover that in detail in our Wim Hof safety post.\n\n## How BreathSesh maps onto the mechanism\n\nBreathSesh ships four patterns, and each one sits at a different point on the breath-rate axis. Calm Breathing and Box both fall close to the resonance band (around 4 to 6 breaths per minute). 4-7-8 sits below, where the long exhale dominates and the technique skews toward sleep onset rather than HRV training. Wim Hof sits in a separate category entirely (sympathetic challenge, not parasympathetic engagement, and with its own contraindications). All four patterns run offline without an account, which only matters here in the sense that nothing about resonance breathing depends on a server. The physiology is intrinsic. The phone is just the metronome.\n\n## The bottom line\n\nThe vagus nerve is well-established anatomy. The parasympathetic role of the vagus is well-established physiology. Slow breathing measurably engages it through the stretch-receptor and baroreceptor pathways above, and the acute effect is real but modest. The specific framings most popular wellness writing leans on (polyvagal-branch claims, HRV-as-clean-vagal-tone-readout, \"tone your vagus in five minutes\") are oversold. The mechanism is more interesting than the marketing version, and it asks less of you in return: a couple of minutes a day, somewhere near 6 breaths per minute, sustained over weeks. That is the calibrated picture the research supports.","metaTitle","metaDescription","The vagus nerve is the wiring of your parasympathetic nervous system. How it works, what the research shows, and what's still debated.","ogImageUrl","/images/blog/25-breath-as-light.webp","authorId",2,"categoryId",5,"status","published","publishedAt",["D",1776515589379],"updatedAt",["D",1776515589379],"createdAt",["D",1776515589379],"readingTimeMinutes",11,"isFeatured",true,"viewCount",0,"author",{"_8":29,"_10":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":-5,"_60":-5,"_61":-5,"_38":62,"_36":63},"dr-mia-chen","name","Dr. Mia Chen","bio","Mia holds a PhD in Respiratory Physiology and spent six years in academic research on autonomic nervous system function before moving to science communication. At BreathSesh she covers the physiology of breathwork, the research literature, and all safety content. She reads studies so you don't have to.","avatarUrl","/images/authors/dr-mia-chen.webp","jobTitle","PhD Physiology, Science Editor","company","BreathSesh Editorial","twitterHandle","linkedinUrl","websiteUrl",["D",1776499815906],["D",1776499815906],"category",{"_8":31,"_10":66,"_49":67,"_68":69,"_23":70,"_24":71,"_72":-5,"_38":73},"science","Science","description","The physiology and research behind breathwork, in plain language.","The Science of Breathwork: Vagus Nerve, HRV, Research","How breathing affects the nervous system, what the research actually shows, and what's still unknown.","parentId",["D",1776515589379],{"_8":31,"_10":66,"_49":67,"_68":69,"_23":70,"_24":71,"_72":-5,"_38":75},["D",1776515589379],"currentPage",1,"totalPages","siteName","BreathSesh","actionData","errors"]